Landscaping in San Francisco, CA: top 60 ranked

Scored on reputation, findability, content, trust and AI visibility. Last updated 2026-09-09, rubric 3.0.0. This is the top 60 listings Google Places returned for this trade and city, not a complete census of the market. How this is scored.

What the data shows

28 of the 50 sites this scan could read publish no LocalBusiness structured data, so nothing in their markup states the business type or the city it serves in a form a machine can read.
6 of 60 have no website on their Google listing.
4 of 60 list a website this scan could not audit: it redirected away from the listed address, answered with an error, or did not answer at all.

The 60 businesses in this scan

Landscaping in San Francisco, CA: top 60 businesses, ranked by score.
#	Business	Score	Rating	Reviews
1	Glscapes Inc.	72.8	5.0	63
2	Chop Chop Landscaping	58.8	—	0
3	Alder Landscape Architecture	57.3	5.0	13
4	FLETCHER STUDIO	56.8	5.0	3
5	Madroño Landscape Design Studio	56.0	4.8	18
6	Inside Out Landscaping	52.0	5.0	20
7	The Urban Gardener	50.3	5.0	3
8	Gerardo Mariona	49.4	5.0	11
9	Near Me Landscaping San Francisco	44.5	5.0	6
10	Flora Grubb Gardens Plant Nursery	42.5	4.7	438
11	Green Valley Landscaping Services	40.7	5.0	22
12	Giant Landscaping, INC: 15+ years in business	39.2	5.0	43
13	Landscaping San Francisco Experts Tied on score	37.7	5.0	2
14	Spade Gardens & Landscaping Tied on score	37.7	1.0	1
15	Ground Cover Landscaping	37.3	5.0	3
16	Rock & Rose Landscapes	35.4	4.4	23
17	Buzz Landscape	34.5	—	0
18	Cobble & Forge	34.3	5.0	3
19	Go Green Landscape 2177 Bayshore Blvd	34.2	5.0	8
20	Bruno's Landscaping	33.1	5.0	1
21	Artisans Landscape Inc	31.6	5.0	5
22	Go Green Landscape 584 Castro St Ste 515	29.3	5.0	1
23	Garden for the Environment	29.1	4.9	48
24	BASE Landscape Architecture	27.5	—	0
25	Bauman Landscape & Construction	26.9	2.7	7
26	Katharine Webster Landscape Design	26.3	5.0	3
27	Franco Landscaping And Maintenance LLC	25.8	—	0
28	Reynolds-Sebastiani Design Services LLC	24.8	5.0	13
29	Artisan Home Resorts- San Francisco	22.8	5.0	1
30	Andrea Cochran Landscape Architecture	21.3	5.0	1
31	Growsgreen Landscape Design	20.3	5.0	1
32	sfgardening.com	19.0	5.0	20
33	Surfacedesign	18.4	5.0	2
34	Blooms Gardening	16.9	4.6	10
35	SFGUF (San Francisco's Gardens and Urban Farms) No website listed	13.3	5.0	3
36	JML Landscapes	13.2	5.0	7
37	Ed's Garden Service	11.4	5.0	11
38	Paco Landscaping No website listedTied on score	11.3	5.0	1
39	Ballesteros Landscape Maintenance No website listedTied on score	11.3	5.0	1
40	Greener Bay Landscaping Inc. Listed domain redirects off-site	10.2	4.7	95
41	Zenscape	9.7	5.0	8
42	Cara Nelson Landscape Architect	9.2	5.0	8
43	CMG Landscape Architecture	8.6	4.6	8
44	GLS Landscape \| Architecture	7.9	5.0	2
45	Randy Thueme Design	6.6	5.0	1
46	Bjorkland -Reyes Landscaping	5.9	5.0	2
47	San Francisco Landscapes Corporation	3.1	5.0	1
48	Christopher Lines designs	2.2	5.0	7
49	The Foxy Garden	1.4	5.0	2
50	Lakian Landscapes Site answered HTTP 404	1.3	5.0	3
51	Space Open Studio	1.1	5.0	5
52	Munden Fry Landscape Associates - San Francisco Tied on score	0.2	—	0
53	Strata Landscape Architecture Tied on score	0.2	—	0
54	Landscaping San Francisco, CA No website listedTied on score	0.0	—	0
55	Arterra Landscape Architects Tied on score	0.0	5.0	5
56	Yarden Tied on score	0.0	4.7	24
57	Marin Garden & Landscapes No website listedTied on score	0.0	—	0
58	DAC - Landscape San Francisco Site answered HTTP 404Tied on score	0.0	5.0	1
59	ApexBros Landscaping San Francisco No website listedTied on score	0.0	—	0
60	Forevergreen Landscape Site answered HTTP 403Tied on score	0.0	—	0

13 of these 60 rows share a score with another row and are marked Tied on score. Rows are ordered by score, and rows on an equal score are left in the order the Google Places query returned them in, so the difference between two tied ranks is not something this rubric measured.

These rows as data: data.json and data.csv. Both are written beside this page in the same build, from the same scan record the table is built from.

Scan history

2026-09-09 · 60 businesses (rubric 3.0.0)
2026-09-04 · 60 businesses (rubric 3.0.0)

The count is how deep that scan was run, not how many businesses the market held that day. A scan run deeper finds more because it looked further, and scans are never compared across rubric versions.