Landscaping in Boston, MA: top 60 ranked

Scored on reputation, findability, content, trust and AI visibility. Last updated 2026-09-09, rubric 3.0.0. This is the top 60 listings Google Places returned for this trade and city, not a complete census of the market. How this is scored.

What the data shows

The 60 businesses in this scan

Landscaping in Boston, MA: top 60 businesses, ranked by score.
# Business Score Rating Reviews
1 All Star Landscaping & Masonry Service 83.8
4.8 35
2 a Blade of Grass 79.5
4.9 33
3 AMR Landscape Associates - Boston 76.4
5.0 31
4 Fitzgerald Landscape and Hardscape, LLC 75.0
5.0 44
5 Boston Landscaping Services 72.2
3.0 6
6 The Urban Gardener Landscape Service LLC 71.1
5.0 18
7 EP Landscape Demo & Services LLC - Boston 70.8
4.9 105
8 Mendez Construction and Landscaping Inc 70.6
4.9 44
9 Boston Landscape Supply 66.1
5.0 1
10 Boston Landscape Co. 65.4
3.7 3
11 Lawn Doctor of Boston 64.4
4.9 1,031
12 A&M Home Snow Removal Services 60.6
4.7 29
13 M&M Construction Landscaping and Masonry 59.8
4.4 20
14 The Boston Landscaping Company 59.0
5.0 25
15 Lawn Care Plus Inc. 57.3
4.6 17
16 Jean Brooks Landscapes 55.8
5.0 24
17 Roger's Snow Removal & Landscaping 55.5
4.7 60
18 B & S Landscaping & Tree Removal Services LLC 54.9
5.0 46
19 Ideal Landscaping Services Inc 53.4
5.0 2
20 LawnStarter 52.1
3.3 79
21 Rose Landscaping and Construction 51.9
4.9 49
22 Cityscapes Plant Care Inc 50.8
4.7 31
23 Boston Landscaping and Lawn Specialist 50.5
4.7 19
24 Bartsch Landscape Architecture 50.0
5.0 6
25 BrightView Landscapes
70 Ceylon St
49.9
3.8 13
26 BrightView Landscapes
17 Electric Ave
49.1
3.6 8
27 M J Nicholls
Blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended
48.5
4.3 107
28 Mora Landscaping LLC 48.2
5.0 6
29 S & G Hardscaping And Plowing 45.9
4.9 20
30 Najera's Landscaping 44.8
5.0 4
31 Mike's Landscaping & General Contracting Co., Inc. 44.5
4.3 44
32 HLH Landscaping & Hardscaping 41.9
5.0 9
33 Millstone Landscape 37.3
5.0 4
34 Alvarez Landscaping Inc
Tied on score
36.7
5.0 34
35 A&M Home Services LLC
Tied on score
36.7
5.0 25
36 KOSKO LANDSCAPING 35.1
5.0 11
37 A&M Masonry & Landscape Services 31.2
5.0 6
38 Landscape Express 27.8
4.5 46
39 Sophie Bignet Landscape Design LLC 26.9
5.0 5
40 LeafLore Landscaping Inc
Tied on score
26.3
5.0 13
41 De La Tierra Landscaping
Tied on score
26.3
5.0 4
42 FERNANDO LANDSCAPING LLC
No website listed
23.1
5.0 45
43 G&G Landscaping LLC 21.2
5.0 6
44 Offshoots Productive Landscapes 21.0
4.9 31
45 MDLA Landscape Architecture 20.6
5.0 5
46 Faithful Flowers 19.6
4.8 21
47 Green landscaping & construction
No website listed
19.1
5.0 17
48 John Anthony's Landscaping, LLC. 18.2
4.0 8
49 Lucky Yew Landscaping
No website listed
17.4
5.0 11
50 Millennium Hardscape & Landscaping
No website listed
14.6
5.0 5
51 Martinez Landscaping
No website listed
13.3
5.0 3
52 FH LANDSCAPING CORP.
No website listedTied on score
12.4
5.0 2
53 Noah McKenna dba Restoring Roots
No website listedTied on score
12.4
5.0 2
54 Mike and Sons Landscaping
Site answered HTTP 409
12.0
4.9 79
55 Riddle landscaping
Site answered HTTP 403
11.4
4.8 97
56 GreenOp
Listed domain redirects off-site
11.3
4.8 95
57 Shaark Landscaping
Site answered HTTP 404
6.3
5.0 14
58 Gerard Associates 0.2
5.0 12
59 Pristine landscaping services L.L.C
Tied on score
0.0
5.0 24
60 JNJ Crew Landscaping & Tree service
Blocks GPTBot, OAI-SearchBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-ExtendedTied on score
0.0
5.0 1

8 of these 60 rows share a score with another row and are marked Tied on score. Rows are ordered by score, and rows on an equal score are left in the order the Google Places query returned them in, so the difference between two tied ranks is not something this rubric measured.

These rows as data: data.json and data.csv. Both are written beside this page in the same build, from the same scan record the table is built from.

Scan history

The count is how deep that scan was run, not how many businesses the market held that day. A scan run deeper finds more because it looked further, and scans are never compared across rubric versions.